Topic: Construction and territory

Search topics

Filter by type

List of results

  • Informative content

    FAQ SUE n. 67

    Only in the case of interventions on the existing building stock, it is possible to present projects aimed at improving sanitation and hygiene, also via SCIA, conditional on the release of the exemption, even if they do not reach the parameters set by Part Four, Title II of the RE. The improvement must and[...]

  • Informative content

    FAQ SUE n. 65

    Please refer to the contents of managerial determination no. 112/2018. The proposing/certifying technicians are authorized to produce certification of the building consistency, where attempts to find the previous documents were not successful. The right to produce the certification must be acknowledged[...]

  • Informative content

    FAQ SUE n. 63

    By reason of the aforementioned art. the art. 5 paragraph 7, letter c. of the NA of the PGT (regarding the checks for the calculation of the SL) in the art. 88 paragraph 4 of the RE (basement and underground rooms) it is necessary to respect, for service rooms without the presence of people (such as cellars), and therefore [...]

  • Informative content

    FAQ SUE n. 62

    It is believed that a construction set back on the roof of the building constitutes a new front set back from the main one; the height of the building should also be understood as that of the tallest front. FAQ SUE n. 62 - Published on March 6, 2020

  • Informative content

    FAQ SUE n. 61

    The procedure requires the designer to attach the landscape impact examination to the building permit. FAQ SUE n. 61 - Published on March 6, 2020

  • Informative content

    FAQ SUE n. 60

    The amnesties of existing basements are to be considered admissible only where the abuse was carried out after the entry into force of LR 7/2017, otherwise the double compliance referred to in the art. 36 of Presidential Decree 380/2001. FAQ SUE n. 60 - Published on March 6, 2020

  • Informative content

    FAQ SUE n. 59

    Given that the latrine is considered a gross surface area if licensed with an adequate building permit, since it is an intervention carried out in the absence or non-compliance with the building permit of a structural nature as in the case indicated, it is possible, if compliant with the provisions of the urban planning instruments, of the regulations [. ..]

  • Informative content

    FAQ SUE n. 58

    Since it is an intervention of a structural nature as in the case of a balcony, the applicant will necessarily have to ascertain the time of execution for the purposes of verifying compliance with the provisions of the urban planning instruments, the building regulations and the urban planning-building regulations in force at the moment[.. .]

  • Informative content

    FAQ SUE n. 57

    In the absence of structural works and in consideration of the fact that the intervention can be classified as extraordinary maintenance, it is possible to present a single CILA for amnesty pursuant to art. 6 bis of Presidential Decree 380/2001, presented by both current owners. For both imaging units[...]

  • Informative content

    FAQ SUE n. 55

    Any favorable opinion, issued as part of the optional preliminary investigation pursuant to art. 40 RE, relating to an intervention resulting in conflict with the changes made to the PGT, will not be able to retain any validity with respect to the changes made to the urban planning legislation. FAQ ABOUT[...]

No results