Is it always mandatory to indicate in the regional forms the company that will carry out the structural works?

On the first page of model 2 of the regional forms, there is the possibility of choosing whether the seismic deposit also has the value of reporting pursuant to art. 65 of Presidential Decree 380/2001 (known as "reinforced concrete warehouse").

The deposit pursuant to art. 65 must be carried out by the executing company and must also contain the appointment and acceptance of the tester. This deposit must take place before the start of the works.
On the contrary, the seismic deposit can be carried out by the Client or by the Seismic Delegate (if appointed) without identifying the executing company and the tester. It will then be the responsibility of the Executing Company to present the form with its own data as an integration, together with the nomination and acceptance of the tester. 

Note: given the need to issue the certification of the superelevation, in such cases it is useful to suggest to the technician and the client to deliver the seismic deposit with or without value pursuant to art. 65 well in advance of the start of the works.

FAQ SUE n. 2 - Published on 6 March 2020

Updated: 20/03/2020